Every line of code written for your specific use case.
+300
Projects delivered
15+
Years of experience
100%
Senior team
Bespoke software is not expensive. Poorly designed software that needs rewriting in two years is expensive. When the system you need doesn't exist on the market, or when standard solutions don't scale to your operation, building bespoke is the most profitable long-term decision. The question isn't 'how much does it cost', but 'how much does it cost you not to have it?'. Check our guide on how much it costs to develop an app.
Dribba has been building high-performance software for companies that cannot afford technical compromises for over 15 years. No templates, no low-code for critical systems, no shortcuts that generate debt. Solid architecture, clean code and verifiable delivery. We start with a technical scoping that defines the real cost before committing the first euro.
Related services
Frequently asked questions
Bespoke software makes sense when: your business process is a competitive differentiator you shouldn't standardise, when market solutions charge a percentage of your revenue that at scale exceeds development cost, when you need very specific integrations with proprietary systems, or when security and data sovereignty requirements cannot be met by an external SaaS.
With three practices most agencies omit: real technical documentation (not auto-generated JSDoc), automated tests with over 80% coverage, and an architecture that clearly separates business domain from infrastructure. When the underlying technology changes, only the infrastructure layer changes, not the business logic. That's the difference between software that ages and software that evolves.
It depends on complexity, but there are indicative ranges: an internal system with authentication, complex CRUD and basic integrations, between €40,000 and €80,000. A high-performance system with microservices architecture, high availability and enterprise integrations, between €80,000 and €200,000+. The most honest way to know is starting with a technical scoping of 2–3 weeks that defines the real budget with ±15% margin.
Yes, although we always start with a technical audit of the existing code to understand the real state of the system. Depending on the state, the recommendation may be: incremental evolution, module-by-module refactoring, or a rewrite if technical debt makes sustainable maintenance impossible. We never promise we can maintain any code without auditing it first.
Have a project in mind?
No commitment, no small print. An honest assessment of your idea with the team that will build it.